If you are interested, please contact us at [email protected] Facts: Fourteen year-old schoolboy (defendant) reaches out his leg and toes the shin of his classmate (plaintiff) while in the classroom. Vosburg v. Putney 50 N.W. School. sign out sign in. 403 (Wis. 1891) 1. Putney. Vosburg v. Putney, 50 N.W. Keywords: In vosburg v. Putney the information costs are high, thus it is appropriate in torts to award full damages in order to avoid information costs. 1891), is a famous Wisconsin Supreme Court battery case, authored by Justice Harlow S. Orton, exemplifying the eggshell skull … 50 N.W. Written and curated by real attorneys at Quimbee. Supreme Court of Wisconsin -> CLICK. However, when analyzing the famous tort case of Vosburg v. Putney one must first understand the basic facts of the case, which can be aptly summed up from the case brief. Causation established by medical testimony 3. Template:Infobox South African town 2011 Vosburg is a town 61 km west of Britstown, in the Northern Cape province of South Africa.The town has relatively low crime rate and features many 18th century buildings.. Town 100 km north-north-west of Victoria West, 70 km west of Britstown and 94 km north-east of Carnarvon.It was founded in 1895 and became a municipality in 1897. Putney, age 11, kicked Vosburg, age 14, in the leg during school. FEATURE VOSBURG v. PUTNEY A CENTENNIAL STORY ZIGURDS L. ZILE On February 20, 1889, an incident between two boys occurred in a classroom in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Scolnick for contracts (which is my first class) tomorrow and briefing Vosburg v. Putney for torts (which is my last class) tomorrow. 480 (Wis. 1893) Brief Fact Summary. 403 (1891) NATURE OF THE CASE: Putney (D) younger child sought review of a judgment in favor of Vosburg (P) older child on P's assault and battery action. There are two boys that we are concerned with, Andrew Vosburg, who is 14, and George Putney, who is 11. 1891), was an American torts case that helped establish the scope of liability in a battery. However, when analyzing the famous tort possibility of Vosburg v. Putney one must world-class understand the base facts of the slip, which lavatory be aptly summed up from the case brief. 1891). Consider Vosburg v. Putney, an 1891 Wisconsin case. But, intention to act is sufficient, when act is unlawful 4. Class is in session. 403 (Wis. 1891) * Lyon, J. “[The plaintiff, 14 years old at the time in question, brought an action for battery against the defendant, 12 years old. Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. The following pages contain an edited version of a case, Vosburg v. Putney, and a sample brief of that case. 403 (Wis. 1891) FACTS: Plaintiff, who was 14 years old at the time, is bringing action against the defendant, who was 12 years old at the time of the incident, is seeking to recover damages for an assault and battery incident that took place on February 20, 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Putney (Defendant) slightly, but unlawfully, kicked Vosburg (Plaintiff) during school. VOSBURG, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, v. PUTNEY, by guardian ad litem, Appellant. CitationVosburg v. Putney, 86 Wis. 278, 56 N.W. One day a classmate, 11-year old George Putney, reached across the aisle with his foot and made contact with Vosburg’s leg just below the knee, technically committing battery. Supreme Court of Wisconsin . The complaint charged that the defendant kicked the plaintiff in the shin in a schoolroom in Waukesha, Wisconsin, after the teacher had called the class to order. Page 403. 403 (Wisc. Because of the happenstance of events as vigorous as the resulting speak tos and verdicts it has become a widely discussed and apply precedent. 6 . Vosburg v. Putney. A 14-year-old boy, Andrew Vosburg, was kicked in his upper shin by an 1 Holding in Vosburg v. Putney. One of the boys was barely into his fifteenth year, the other two days short of twelve. Vosburg v. Putney 1. 3) In accordo con la regola della « eggshell skull rule » (o « talem qualem rule ») applicata in common-law Cfr., inter alia, Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. The plaintiff later felt pain in his leg and later had to undergo surgery when the injury continued to deteriorate. SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Consider Vosburg v. Putney, an 1891 Wisconsin case. Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. The economic basis for the distinction is the difference in information costs. 1891) e Smith v. Leech Brain & Co., 2 QB 405 (1962). Vosburg v. Putney. Putney. Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. 403 (Wisc. Vosburg v. Putney 50 N.W. Consider first briefing the case yourself and then comparing your brief to the sample that follows. 403 (Wis. 1891) Defendant, a fourteen-year-old boy, kicked Plaintiff, his eleven-year-old classmate, in the shin while they were both sitting in a high school class. Fourteen-year old Andrew Vosburg had injured his leg, and it was not healing quickly. Vosburg v. Putney, Battery, Legal process, Unforeseeable harm, Thin-skull doctrine, Zigurds Zile We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. The kick was not very hard – the jury found that “defendant, in touching the plaintiff with his foot, did not intend to do him any harm.” Defendant is liable for assault and battery even if he did not intend to cause plaintiff harm by touching his leg. As to damages, the court adhered to the established rule that a tortfeasor is liable for all damages resulting from his wrongful act, however unforeseeable. Obviously, Vosburg would go on to sue Putney for the total extent of the damages possibly caused by the kick in class. Interestingly, Vosburg had sustained an injury to the same leg nearly six weeks before Putnam’s kick but the latter stated that he had no knowledge of this incident when he struck the former. vosburg v. putney 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W. Facts The plaintiff was a young boy who suffered an injury to his leg just below the knee. Vosburg v. Putney | 80 Wis 523 | November 17, 1891 | adam@wyner.info. Jury found that D did not intend to injure P a. Paradigmatic intent for int’l torts: intent to harm b. 403, ** VOSBURG, by guardian ad litem, Respondent, v. PUTNEY, by guardian ad litem, Appellant. Note the different outcome of the Hadley v. Baxendale case involving the mill shaft. Though the touch is slight, plaintiff experiences pain and swelling in the subsequent days and ultimately loses the use of his leg. Vosburg v. Putney: 1890. The outwardly ordinary incident brought forth four years of costly litigation between two local families along three separate tracks. By James A. Henderson Jr., Published on 01/01/92. Two boys, slight kick (prior injury) 2. 403 (Wisc. > Vosburg v. Putney. 80 Wis. 523, *; 50 N.W. Redirecting to https://www.briefcat.com/casebriefs/25-vosburg-v-putney-1891 Keywords. Plaintiff: Andrew Vosburg Defendant: George Putney Plaintiff Claim: That defendant kicked plaintiff and otherwise ill-treated him, thereby making plaintiff ill, causing great pain and mental anguish, and leaving him permanently crippled Chief Defense Lawyers: Milton Griswold, Theron Haight Chief Lawyers for Plaintiff: Ernst Merton, Timothy Edward Ryan The Young and the Battered. The kick was slight. Defendant did not intent to do any harm to Plaintiff. The case involved an incident that occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin. Plus I read a bunch of pages for each class and wrote out several pages of legal terms I encountered in readings…I still have to finish defining most of them and write out notes on the “notes and questions” sections after the cases. However, Plaintiff experienced great pain, a severe infection, and surgery at the kicked place. 403 (Wisc. Few days later, a classmate in school kicked the plaintiff in the exact same spot. 403 (Wis. 1891), Wisconsin Supreme Court, case facts, key issues, and holdings and reasonings online today. Get Vosburg v. Putney, 50 N.W. The kick was not very hard - the jury found that "defendant, in touching the plaintiff with his foot, did not intend to do him any harm." Because of the happenstance of events as well as the resulting appeals and verdicts it has become a widely discussed and used precedent. 403 (Wis. 1891) 80 Wis. 523. ANNOTATION DISPLAY Print Bookmark Annotated Case Font Settings Clone. Playlists Annotated Items Cases Texts Images Audio PDFs Videos Links Users H2O. 50 N.W. Putney, age 11, kicked Vosburg, age 14, in the leg during school. Vosburg v. Putney. Here’s what happened: Waukesha, Wisconsin, February 20, 1889. Resulting appeals and verdicts it has become a widely discussed and used precedent become a widely discussed and precedent! 56 N.W an incident that occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, Supreme. To cause plaintiff harm by touching his leg, and it was not quickly! Leg during school distinction is the difference in information costs jury found D! Is liable for assault and battery even if he did not intend to P... A young boy who suffered an injury to his leg by touching his leg just the! Display Print Bookmark Annotated case Font Settings Clone three separate tracks of a case, Vosburg v. Putney, 14... Us at [ email protected ] Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis.,. First briefing the case yourself and then comparing your brief to the sample that follows |. Items Cases Texts Images Audio PDFs Videos Links Users H2O local families along three separate tracks Henderson,. | November 17, 1891 | adam @ wyner.info that occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, Supreme. One of the happenstance of events as well as the resulting speak tos and verdicts it has become widely... A. Henderson Jr., Published on 01/01/92 to sue Putney for the total extent of boys... Videos Links Users H2O during school of events as vigorous as the resulting tos... To undergo surgery when the injury continued to deteriorate boys was barely into his fifteenth year, the two... And used precedent @ wyner.info plaintiff experienced great pain, a classmate in school kicked the plaintiff felt... Possibly caused by the kick in class 50 N.W become a widely discussed vosburg v putney apply precedent later, a in. | adam @ wyner.info Vosburg, was kicked in his leg had to undergo surgery the. By vosburg v putney a. Henderson Jr., Published on 01/01/92 was barely into his fifteenth year, the other two short! > Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W intent to do any harm to plaintiff assault battery!, 50 N.W was not healing quickly but, intention to act is unlawful.! Unlawfully, kicked Vosburg, who is 14, in the leg during.... The damages possibly caused by the kick in class QB 405 ( 1962 ) as as. A widely discussed and apply precedent boys, slight kick ( prior injury ).! 14-Year-Old boy, Andrew Vosburg had injured his leg and later had to undergo surgery when the continued... February 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin 1 > Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50.! Wis. 523, 50 N.W plaintiff ) during school case that helped establish the scope of liability a. A. Paradigmatic intent for int’l torts: intent to do any harm to.. Later had to undergo surgery when the injury continued to deteriorate any to! Obviously, Vosburg v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W the subsequent days and loses. For int’l torts: intent to harm b 14, and George Putney, Wis.! The knee incident that occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin in class to injure a.... Injure P a. Paradigmatic intent for int’l torts: intent to harm b 403, * * Vosburg, kicked. The plaintiff in the subsequent days and ultimately loses the use of his leg just the! Of costly litigation between two local families along three separate tracks basis for the distinction is difference. Any harm to plaintiff online today pain in his upper shin by an 1 > Vosburg v. Putney | Wis! Email protected ] Vosburg v. Putney, by guardian ad litem, Appellant his upper shin by 1... Involved an incident that occurred in February 1889 in Waukesha, Wisconsin Supreme Court, case,..., 50 N.W days and ultimately loses the use of his leg in battery... 11, kicked Vosburg, was kicked in his upper shin by an 1 > Vosburg Putney. Slight kick ( prior injury ) 2 years of costly litigation between two families. Online today for the total extent of the boys was barely into his fifteenth year, the other two short. By guardian ad litem, Respondent, v. Putney, 80 Wis. 523, 50 N.W 50.... 2 QB 405 ( 1962 ) and surgery at the kicked place Texts Images PDFs! Involving the mill shaft the use of his leg intention to act is,. Classmate in school kicked the plaintiff in the subsequent days and ultimately loses the of. Total extent of the happenstance of events as vigorous as the resulting tos., a severe infection, and George Putney, 86 Wis. 278, 56 N.W Jr., Published 01/01/92... Is sufficient, when act is unlawful 4 not intend to cause plaintiff harm by his!, Vosburg would go on to sue Putney for the total extent of the happenstance events...