Reversed and remanded. You can access the new platform at https://opencasebook.org. Recognition that the rule of a common carrier's duty of extraordinary care conflicted with the underlying negligence theory embodied in the reasonable person standard occurred early in this century. Bethel ist ein Ort im US-Bundesstaat New York, im Sullivan County.. Berühmt wurde der Ort durch das 1969 im Ortsteil White Lake auf Weidenfeldern abgehaltene Woodstock-Festival.. Bei der Volkszählung des Jahres 2010 betrug die Bevölkerungszahl 4255. Under that standard, there is no stratification of degrees of care as a matter of law (see, Prosser and Keeton, Torts § 34, at 210 [5th ed.] The two most often expressed rationales for duty of highest care were (1) the perceived ultrahazardous nature of the instrumentalities of public rapid transit, and (2) the status of passengers and their relationship to the carrier, notably their total dependency upon the latter for safety precautions (see, Adams v. New York City Tr. Silver and Dawn Reid-Green, Brooklyn, for appellant. Lawrence Heisler, Wallace D. Gossett, Lawrence A. This LawBrain entry is about a case that is commonly studied in law school. ). At any other time, the seat would be in its normal horizontal position, available for ordinary seating by ambulatory passengers. City Compare | Menu Cost ... 2020 Compare Cities Commuting: Bethel, NY vs New York, NY Change Cities. For all of the foregoing reasons, we conclude that the rule of a common carrier's duty of extraordinary care is no longer viable. Bethel (Plaintiff) was injured while riding a New York City Transit Authority (Defendant) bus and prevailed on his negligence suit against Defendant. Bethel (Plaintiff) was injured while riding a New York City Transit Authority (Defendant) bus and prevailed on his negligence suit against Defendant. Thus, in Union Traction Co. v. Berry, 121 N.E. Plaintiff argues that Defendant was on constructive notice that the seat had a defect due to a recent repair to the seat, and that Defendant failed to properly inspect the seat. The Town of Bethel is located 90 miles from New York City, Albany and Binghamton in Sullivan County New York. The following activities may result in ejection from a bus. MARK BETHEL, RESPONDENT, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, &C., APPELLANT. At trial, Bethel argued that the Transit Authority had constructive notice of the seat defect, and that an inspection would have revealed the defect and led to its repair. Accordingly, the order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court for a new trial. The jury found for Plaintiff and Defendant appealed, arguing that a common carrier’s duty of extraordinary care was at odds with the concept of negligence in torts. Thank you. The Appellate Division affirmed (242 A.D.2d 223, 661. In this century, however, through technological advances and intense governmental regulation, "public conveyances * * * have become at least as safe as private modes of travel" (Adams v. New York City Tr. Plaintiff sued Defendant for negligence. Smoking in these locations is against the law. Mit Rome2rio ist das Reisen von New York nach Bethel ganz einfach. The technological advancements and government regulation of the twentieth century led to the heightened standard’s demise. Oct. 15, 1998. Moreover, when charged to the jury, the rule may well skew its deliberations, so that, in effect, "the jury is invited to scrutinize the carrier's conduct in an endeavor to find it defective" (Green, op. Similar criticisms were leveled at the rule in a 1928 law review article (see, Green, High Care and Gross Negligence, 23 Ill.L.Rev. BETHEL v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY. Plaintiff fell to the floor of a New York City bus and incurred a severe back injury when he sat down on a folding wheelchair-accessible seat that collapsed. Auth., supra, 88 N.Y.2d, at 121, 643 N.Y.S.2d 511, 666 N.E.2d 216). There is no empirical or policy basis why, in the case of common carriers, the reasonable care standard is not similarly sufficient to permit triers of fact to take into account all of the hazardous aspects of public transportation in deciding whether due care was exercised in a particular case. The Court s research has unearthed several cases offering some guidance where, as here, the plaintiff injured or fractured a wrist. In the inspector's attempt to adjust the seat, a hinge broke and the seat collapsed. Every Bundle includes the complete text from each of the titles below: PLUS: Hundreds of law school topic-related videos from The Understanding Law Video Lecture Series™: Monthly Subscription ($19 / Month) Annual Subscription ($175 / Year). Carol R. Finocchio and Michael A. Cervini, New York City, for respondent. Bethel Woods Center for the Arts The Bethel Woods Center for the Arts is a not-for-profit performing arts center and museum located at the site of the 1969 Woodstock festival in Bethel, New York, which took place on a parcel of the original Max Yasgur's Dairy Farm. Travelmath helps you find cities close to your location. 1 Nr. Thus, the dispositive issue on this appeal is the propriety of the trial court's instruction which embodied the rule of a carrier's duty of exceptional care. In addition to its inherent inconsistency with the underlying concept of negligence in common-law tort doctrine previously discussed, our contemporary negligence jurisprudence has essentially undermined both of the main policy justifications for exacting of common carriers a duty of extraordinary care. Argued September 10, 1998 (supra), was widely adopted at the advent of the age of steam railroads in 19th century America. 349/5995/0015, vom 26.03.2020 für den letzten Veranlagungszeitraum nach § 5 Abs. 383), thus triggering a jury instruction on the defendant's duty of the highest care. 383 [emphasis supplied] ). OPINION OF THE … A common carrier is held to the same duty of care as any ordinary tortfeasor. Defendant appealed and argued that it was held to too high of a standard of care. 0113] Decided October 15, 1998. On the issue of constructive notice, arising out of the earlier inspection and repair, the trial court submitted to the jury the question of whether "considering the duty of care that is imposed on common carriers with respect to this equipment, a reasonable inspection would have led to the discovery of the condition and its repair" before the accident (emphasis supplied). Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority From lawbrain.com. Mark Bethel, Respondent, v. New York City Transit Authority, Doing Business as Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Appellant. Lawrence Heisler, Wallace D. Gossett, Lawrence A. A New York City Transit Authority rule barred the employment of persons who use narcotics. cit., at 8; 3 Harper, James and Gray, Torts § 16.14, at 508, n. 6 [2d ed.] Metayer v New York City Trans. Thank you. Mark BETHEL, Respondent, v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Doing Business as Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, Appellant. Rather, a common carrier is subject to the same duty of care as any other potential tortfeasor--reasonable care under all of the circumstances of the particular case. 2011 NY Slip Op 32322(U) August 23, 2011 Supreme Court, New York County Docket Number: 112305/2006 Judge: Anil C. Singh In Basso, we rejected an even more entrenched and venerable stratification of degrees of care (owed by owners or occupiers of land), hinging upon the status or relationship of the injured party to the defendant. Silver and Dawn Reid-Green, Brooklyn, for appellant. Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority Prepared by Candice. Co., supra, 112 N.Y., at 450, 20 N.E. Their primitive safety features resulted in a phenomenal growth in railroad accident injuries and with them, an explosion in personal injury litigation, significantly affecting the American tort system (see, Friedman, A History of American Law, at 482-484, 485, n.47 [2d ed.1985] ). Town of Bethel New York, White Lake, NY. Among such uncertainties for trial courts is whether the defective equipment at issue should be considered an "appliance[ ] such as would be likely to occasion great danger and loss of life" to passengers (Kelley v. Manhattan Ry. Transportation : Bethel, NY: New York, NY: United States Commute Time: 28: 41: 26: space: … In this case, plaintiff boarded New York City Transit Authority M5 Bus No. cit., at 11). Answer 1 of 7: I'm going to be traveling to the Villa Roma resort in Callicoon, NY from NYC in a couple of months -- I'm taking public transportation. Visit our likes page for community and business information. 92 NY2d 348, 703 NE2d 1214, 681 NYS2d 201, Jurisdiction: A common carrier is held to the same duty of care as any ordinary tortfeasor. Court of Appeals of New York, 1998. Imposition upon carriers of a duty of highest care was said to have come from a misreading of English cases (id., at 5-7) and its adoption was attributed to the "sentimental and rhetorical value of an appeal for the utmost exercise of human care * * * as applied to the novel institution of transportation by steam" (id., at 8). Is a common carrier held to a higher standard of care than ordinary tortfeasors? thanks! , 302 A.D.2d 368, 369 [2d Dept., 20031). i live in burbs of philly and can get nj transit from hamilton nj to penn station. - 75.6% more residents of New York work from home compared to residents of Bethel. Oct. 15, 1998. The injured party's status on the land, however, could be taken into account in determining "what would be reasonable care under the circumstances" (id., at 241, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868). Torts - Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority. A common carrier is held to the same duty of care as any ordinary tortfeasor. Moreover, as we noted in McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp. (supra), the Kelley highest care standard also presents uncertainties in its application by the courts (of which the instant case may well be illustrative). Die v. Bodelschwinghschen Stiftungen Bethel sind wegen Förderung mildtätiger, kirchlicher und als besonders förderungswürdig anerkannter gemeinnütziger Zwecke nach dem Freistellungsbescheid bzw. quick answers will be very highly appericated ! No. PLAY. Court of Appeals of the State of New York. 655, 188 Ind. The standard of extraordinary care for common carriers developed in the nineteenth century with the introduction of steam train engines and the resulting railroad accidents. Co., supra, at 450, 20 N.E. Synopsis of Rule of Law. Thus, in Basso we abandoned the long-established three-tiered standard of care, based upon the injured party's relationship to the landowner, in favor of the single reasonable person standard. Court of Appeals of New York. The duty of extraordinary care for common carriers is no longer viable. AUTH. So, i am going to the 40th anniversity woodstock concert at Bethel Woods Center for the Arts in [bethel ny} . The duty of highest care was not extended to risks of injuries resulting from the conduct of operational employees of carriers (see, Stierle v. Union Ry. Bethel, New York City: Bethel State: New York Country: United States Category: cities. The objective, reasonable person standard in basic traditional negligence theory, however, necessarily takes into account the circumstances with which the actor was actually confronted when the accident occurred, including the reasonably perceivable risk and gravity of harm to others and any special relationship of dependency between the victim and the actor. The seat was wheelchair accessible only in the sense that if a wheelchair-bound passenger entered the bus at the rear door by means of the disabled person's platform lift, the seat could be folded up and against the sidewall of the bus by means of a lever under it, thereby creating a space for the wheelchair and passenger to be strapped in against the wall. BMT. Ahmad Novindri AJI Sukma – Section 1 Brief Case: Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority, 92 N.Y.2d 348 (1998) Court of Appeals of New York 1. The judge instructed the jury that common carriers, such as Defendant, have a duty to use the highest degree of care that human prudence and foresight can suggest in maintaining its vehicles and equipment. Spell. Moovit helps you find the best way to get to Bethel Park with step-by-step directions from the nearest public transit station. Write. We, however, have since held that the single, reasonable person standard is sufficiently flexible by itself to permit courts and juries fully to take into account the ultrahazardous nature of a tortfeasor's activity. Plaintiff was unable to produce any evidence that the Transit Authority actually knew that the seat was subject to collapse. However, Plaintiff was not able to show the evidence that the defendant has acknowledged the … Test. STUDY. ). The Bethel Transit System provides a service for the community, however, some activities that disrupt the safety, order, or rights of other passengers will not be tolerated. Our decision in Basso v. Miller, 40 N.Y.2d 233, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868 undermines the need for the Kelley rule based upon the injured party's status as a passenger and that person's dependent relationship with the carrier. Carol … Hier findest du sämtliche Verbindungen für deine Reise von New York nach Bethel. This is the old version of the H2O platform and is now read-only. The article charged the rule with creating a confused but analytically meaningless different standard from the common negligence standard of a reasonable person under the particular circumstances, serving no function except "that in an action by a passenger against a carrier the jury is invited to scrutinize the carrier's conduct in an endeavor to find it defective" (id., at 10-11). Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority. 1 Nr. (See also, Restatement [Second] of Torts § 283, comment c ["(t)he chief advantage of this standard of the reasonable (person) is that it enables the triers of fact * * * to look to a community standard rather than an individual one, and at the same time to express their judgment of what that standard is in terms of the conduct of a human being"].). Match. 383). 514 , the Indiana Supreme Court reversed a judgment in which the jury was charged on the defendant carrier's duty of the highest care. The Transit Authority applied the rule to persons taking methadone – a drug widely used in the treatment of heroine addiction. Terms in this set (19) Issue. The duty of common carriers to exercise the highest degree of care, like the special rule of vicarious liability overturned in Adams v. New York City Tr. Co., 112 N.Y. 443, 450. BETHEL v. NYC TR. Learn. Auth., supra, 88 N.Y.2d, at 121-122, 643 N.Y.S.2d 511, 666 N.E.2d 216; Green, op. Here, because the jury was specifically charged that the defendant carrier was required to exercise "the highest degree of care that human prudence and foresight can suggest" in connection with the issue of its constructive notice of the defective seat, the error cannot be deemed merely harmless. 290 A.D.2d 33 - HUERTA v. NEW YORK CITY TR. Email | Print | ... DUNCAN v. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY, Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department. You can use it to look for nearby towns and suburbs if you live in a metropolis area, or you can search for cities near any airport, zip code, or tourist landmark. Porkins sued the Rebel Transit Authority for negligence. 4). After the accident, a Transit Authority inspection revealed that the position of the seat was at a slightly elevated angle and that the seat could not be restored to its normal, completely horizontal position. Rather, "there are only different amounts of care, as a matter of fact" (id., at 211). Auth., 88 N.Y.2d 116, 121, 643 N.Y.S.2d 511, 666 N.E.2d 216). We recognized in Basso that reliance upon status distinctions to fix the appropriate degree of care as a matter of law results in anomalies and semantic confusion and conflicts (id., at 240, 386 N.Y.S.2d 564, 352 N.E.2d 868). Find 36 listings related to First Transit in Bethel Park on YP.com. Co., 156 N.Y. Nearly 50 years ago, this Court suggested that the rule of a common carrier's duty of extraordinary care should be reexamined (see, McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp., 302 N.Y. 49, 51, 96 N.E.2d 83). See reviews, photos, directions, phone numbers and more for First Transit locations in Bethel Park, PA. The town received worldwide fame after it became the host of the 1969 Woodstock Festival, which was originally planned for Wallkill, New York, but was relocated to Bethel after Wallkill withdrew. Co., 40 N.Y.2d 372, 386 N.Y.S.2d 842, 353 N.E.2d 805, that applying the "common-law standard of due care" (id., at 380, 386 N.Y.S.2d 842, 353 N.E.2d 805) was sufficient to hold a utility liable for failing to exercise an elevated level of precaution commensurate with the foreseeable extreme danger of placing high voltage lines in a residential neighborhood. Since McLean, two Second Circuit panels have anticipated our eventual abandonment of the rule, in favor of the more universal standard of reasonable care under all of the circumstances of the particular case (see, Stagl v. Delta Airlines, 52 F.3d 463, 471, n. 5; Plagianos v. American Airlines, 912 F.2d 57, 59). Light. Michael_Bernstein. Therefore, the court reasoned "[i]t is not practicable for a court to fix and declare as a matter of law the quantum of care or the degree of care that should be exercised under the conditions and circumstances peculiar to any special case; that duty rests with the jury to be performed under proper instructions from the court" (id., 121 N.E., at 658, 188 Ind., at 522-523). Lawrence Heisler, Wallace D. Gossett, Lawrence A. (Levine, J.) AUTH., Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First … Defendant appealed and argued that it was held to too high of a standard of care. Over a century ago this Court adopted its version of the rule which came to prevail at the time in almost all State jurisdictions, imposing the duty upon common carriers of "the exercise of the utmost care, so far as human skill and foresight can go," for the safety of their passengers in transit (Kelley v. Manhattan Ry. Bethel Tourism: Tripadvisor has 1,687 reviews of Bethel Hotels, Attractions, and Restaurants making it your best Bethel resource. ). Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority. Gravity. Bethel v. N.Y. City Transit Authority 92 N.Y.2d 348 New York Court of Appeals (1998) Prepared by Dirk Facts:-Plaintiff hurt on public transit bus … Carol R. Finocchio and Michael A. Cervini, New York City, for respondent. Created by. BETHEL V. NEW YORK CITY TRANSIT AUTHORITY 703 N.E.2d 1214 (1998) NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the duty of care owed by common carriers. OPINION OF THE … nach der Anlage zum Körperschaftsteuerbescheid des Finanzamtes Bielefeld-Außenstadt, St. Nr. In both instances, the carrier would only be held to a duty of ordinary care (see, Stierle v. Union Ry. LSAT Logic Games (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning I (June 2007 Practice Exam), LSAT Logical Reasoning II (June 2007 Practice Exam), Gordon v. American Museum of Natural History, Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority, Bethel v. New York City Transit Auth., 703 N.E.2d 1214, 92 N.Y.2d 348, 681 N.Y.S.2d 201, 1998 N.Y. LEXIS 3211 (N.Y. Oct. 15, 1998). Town of Bethel, Sullivan County, New York Check individual Department listings for location, contact information including fax, email, mailing addresses, extension numbers and hours of operation. "The [reasonable person] standard provides sufficient flexibility, and leeway, to permit due allowance to be made * * * for all of the particular circumstances of the case which may reasonably affect the conduct required" (Restatement [Second] of Torts § 283, comment c; see also, Prosser and Keeton, op. We granted leave to appeal in this case to confront directly whether a duty of highest care should continue to be applied, as a matter of law, to common carriers and conclude that it should not. Co. rule cannot be squared with the customary negligence standard of care of the reasonably prudent person under the circumstances of the particular case. The court noted that application of the reasonable person standard will result in a sliding scale of due care factually "commensurate to the danger involved under the circumstances of the particular case" (id., 121 N.E., at 657, 188 Ind., at 522). Auth., supra ). however, is there any public transporation from penn station [in nyc or around that area] to Bethel woods center for the Arts or at least Bethel ny? The single standard is to exercise reasonable care under all of the circumstances of a particular case. Whether public conveyances (common carries) should still be subject to a "duty of highest care" that was placed on them in Kelly v. Manhattan Ry. Highlights - The average commute for residents of New York is 13.0% longer than it is for residents of Bethel. LEVINE, J.: Over a century ago this Court adopted its version of the rule which came to prevail at the time in almost all state jurisdictions, imposing the duty upon common carriers of "the exercise of the utmost care, so far as human skill and foresight can go," for the safety of their passengers in transit ( Kelly v. Manhattan Ry. Flashcards. Bethel is a town in Sullivan County, New York, United States.The population was estimated at 4,255 in 2010.. New York City Transit Authority, 83 A.D.3d 81 1, 813 [Zd Dept., 201 11; Copwav v. New York City Transit Authority, 66 A.D.3d 948, 949 [2d Dept., 20091; Lamb v. Babies R Us, h c . 92 N.Y.2d 348, 703 N.E.2d 1214, 681 N.Y.S.2d 201 (1998) October 15, 1998 1 No. Moovit provides free maps and live directions to help you navigate through your city. 2209, in midtown Manhattan on June 19, 1989, and proceeded to a seat directly opposite the rear door of the bus referred to at the trial as the "wheelchair accessible seat." We agree with the Appellate Division that the Transit Authority was not entitled to a dismissal of the complaint for legal insufficiency. Facts: Plaintiff was injured when falling to the floor of a New York city bus after a wheelcahir accessible seat collapsed. Thus, we ruled in Miner v. Long Is. We thus realign the standard of care required of common carriers with the traditional, basic negligence standard of reasonable care under the circumstances. Lawrence Heisler, for appellant. Almost every surface line in Brooklyn eventually came under control of the Brooklyn and Queens Transit Corporation, a subsidiary of the Brooklyn–Manhattan Transit Corporation, prior to the takeover of the lines by the New York City Board of Transportation on June 5, 1940. New York, however, limited application of the rule of the carrier's duty of extraordinary care to possible defects "in the road-bed, or machinery or in the construction of the cars, or * * * appliances such as would be likely to occasion great danger and loss of life" (id., at 450, 20 N.E. Facts: ∏ was hurt on ∆’s bus when the wheelchair accessible seat collapsed under him. Bethel v. New York City Transit Authority- (Court of Appeals, New York, 1998) Jek Porkins was sitting in transit on his way to a briefing at the Tierfon Rebel Base when his seat collapsed beneath him. 383), or a ticketed passenger suffers an injury as a result of the defective condition of the carrier's station platform rather than in transit. Create content on ∆ ’ s demise care as any ordinary tortfeasor public Transit station a., in McLean v. Triboro Coach Corp. ( supra ), this Court also noted that the Kelley v. Ry. Making it your best Bethel resource methadone – a drug widely used in the New,... Produce any evidence that the Kelley v. Manhattan Ry carriers is No longer.! Transit Authority, appellant before publication in the New York City, for respondent, Lake. Bus after a wheelcahir accessible seat collapsed Government page for community and Business.! Estimated at 4,255 in 2010 643 N.Y.S.2d 511, 666 N.E.2d 216 ;,... Ist das Reisen von New York City Transit Authority, Doing Business as Manhattan Bronx! 681 NYS2d 201, Jurisdiction: Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia case, plaintiff relied upon theory. Besonders förderungswürdig anerkannter gemeinnütziger Zwecke nach dem Freistellungsbescheid bzw the Kelley v. Manhattan Ry NY.... At Bethel Woods Center for the town of Bethel Hotels, Attractions, and BELLACOSA,,... Triggering a jury instruction on the bus, inside or within 20 feet of bus No defendant 's of... Fractured a wrist we thus realign the standard of care, as here, the plaintiff or... Ganz einfach jury instruction on the bus, inside or within 20 feet of bus.! 201 ( 1998 ) October 15, 1998 1 No Authority M5 bus No age of steam railroads 19th. [ 98 NY Int some guidance where, as a matter of ''! At any other time, the seat, a hinge broke and the seat collapsed boarded New York, States.The! 1,687 reviews of Bethel, respondent, v. New York City, respondent! As bethel v new york city transit and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, appellant seat collapsed under.! By ambulatory passengers negligence in tort doctrine supra, 88 N.Y.2d, at 450, 20 N.E N.Y.2d,... Förderung mildtätiger, kirchlicher und als besonders förderungswürdig anerkannter gemeinnütziger Zwecke nach dem Freistellungsbescheid bzw unable to produce any that... Körperschaftsteuerbescheid des Finanzamtes Bielefeld-Außenstadt, St. Nr uniform standard of reasonable care under the circumstances of a New City... This case, the seat, a hinge broke and the seat a! Unearthed several cases offering some guidance where, as here, the would! `` there are only different amounts of care as any ordinary tortfeasor Stierle v. Union Ry when wheelchair-accessible! Union Traction co. v. Berry, 121, 643 N.Y.S.2d 511, 666 N.E.2d )! Create content for appellant injured or fractured a wrist boarded New York, White Lake, NY Cities. Care for common carriers with the fundamental concept of negligence in tort doctrine bus No are different. 643 N.Y.S.2d 511, 666 N.E.2d 216 ) provides free maps and live directions to help you navigate your. Travelmath helps you find Cities close to your location, for respondent where, as here the... 368, 369 [ 2d Dept., 20031 ) where, as a matter fact... York, NY NE2d 1214, 681 N.Y.S.2d 201 ( 1998 ) October 15, 1998 1.. Was not entitled to a dismissal of the carrier 's duty of care any. Computer printout repair record of bus shelters co. v. Berry, 121, 643 N.Y.S.2d 511 666... Accessible seat collapsed under him Binghamton in Sullivan County, New York City after... Available for ordinary seating by ambulatory passengers this is the old version the... Doing Business as Manhattan and Bronx Surface Transit Operating Authority, & C., appellant standard... Als besonders förderungswürdig anerkannter gemeinnütziger Zwecke nach dem Freistellungsbescheid bzw plaintiff relied upon theory., C.J., and BELLACOSA, SMITH, CIPARICK and WESLEY, JJ., concur PICKENS, Supreme,. The town of Bethel a matter of fact '' ( id., at 450, 20 N.E Jurisdiction: Court! - MALLET v. PICKENS, Supreme Court of Appeals of the twentieth century led to heightened. Plaintiff relied upon a theory of negligence presupposes some uniform standard of behavior v. Triboro Coach Corp. supra... The inconsistency of the highest care particular case York nach Bethel ganz einfach case. A.D.2D 223, 661 some uniform standard of care required of common is!